{"id":10187,"date":"2020-05-29T10:42:41","date_gmt":"2020-05-29T10:42:41","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.onlinepokeramerica.com\/news\/?p=10187"},"modified":"2020-05-29T11:16:01","modified_gmt":"2020-05-29T11:16:01","slug":"dan-cates-explains-cheating-accusations-responds-to-dan-bilzerian","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.onlinepokeramerica.com\/news\/dan-cates-explains-cheating-accusations-responds-to-dan-bilzerian\/","title":{"rendered":"Dan Cates Explains Cheating Accusations, Responds to Dan Bilzerian"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
Following allegations of cheating Dan Cates<\/strong> has responded to Dan Bilzerian<\/strong>, the person who accused him earlier this week on Monday of cheating in a high-stakes private poker game. In the ensuing Tweet, Cates linked a Google Document<\/strong> (see the tweet) explaining the alleged cheating that took place.<\/p>\n\n\n\n To get some context, Bill Perkins<\/strong>, another poker player, first sounded the alarm of potential cheating afoot when he discretely put the information out there, arguing that he was cheated out of winnings by a \u201cghost player.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n Bilzerian explained in what is now a deleted tweet that Cates played under a smurf account, and specifically Sina Taleb\u2019s<\/strong>. Smurf accounts are used by players of much higher skill level who then join low-skilled games to gain an unfair advantage.<\/p>\n\n\n\n In responding to those statements, Cates conceded that he had used Sina\u2019s account, but noted that many other professional players were using other accounts, too. He also explained that the aforementioned account\u2019s surname was not Taleb.<\/p>\n\n\n\n